alligatorsin ahelicopter

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 19 January 2007

I've Said It Before, But I'll Say It Again...

Posted on 11:33 by pollard
I actually have posted on this before, but since they keep popping up in things I read, I feel that I need to rant about these bad screenwriting habits again.

Things that drive me crazy in your script:

CHARACTERS TALKING TO THEMSELVES. There are times when a character might logically talk to themselves -- hell, there are times when I talk out loud to myself -- but it needs to be done very judiciously and sparingly, if at all.

Instead, I read script after script, where the writer, desperate to make us understand what is going on in a character's head, will have them just blurt it out, even if there is no one else in the room.

I read one script the other day that had about 15 different incidences where this happened, with about a half-dozen different characters. And in most of the cases what they were saying was really very obvious anyway.

Trust your readers/audience to understand things, and if you think they need a push, figure out how to do it visually or more inventively. There's always a better way than the random I'm-alone-but-I'm-chatty blurt out.

MENTIONING THE MOVIE IN THE SCRIPT THAT YOUR SCRIPT IS SIMILAR TO. I've read two scripts in the last week that did this, part of an odd habit that is shockingly widespread and endlessly reoccurring.

It seems to be driven by guilt. Writers who find themselves penning scenes (or storylines) that are derivative of something that came before feel driven to namecheck this film, as if acknowledging it makes it okay.

But there are few really-original moments any more, and pointing out the ones your script is borrowing is counter-productive; it just makes the reader even more-aware that even you know that you haven't put forth the effort to make your tale truly original.

Best-case scenario? You make your script as original as possible. But if it does hew close to something that came before (because that's the best way to tell the story), don't feel you have to point it out. If you are doing a story about some kids going on an adventure, you really don't need a scene in which "The Goonies" plays on a TV in the background, or one of the kids mentions that in "Stand By Me" the kids found a body.

CRIMINAL MISUSE OF APOSTROPHES. "It's" is ONLY to be used to represent "it is", not when something is possessive.

"Let's" is short for "Let us", so you shouldn't write "Lets go".

Apostrophes are used as possessives, or to replace letters. If you are talking about the Kennedy clan, they are the Kennedys, not the Kennedy's.

It's The 1960s, not The 1960's. Shortening years, it should be The '60s, not The 60's.

Characters are in their 30s, not their 30's.

VARYING THE NAME OF THE SAME CHARACTOR IN THE SCENE DESCRIPTION. If a guy's name is John Brown, you shouldn't be calling him John sometimes, and Brown others. In the dialogue, fine, but not in the scene description.

And after you intro characters, we should never see their whole name again. It shouldn't say JOHN BROWN as the name over all the dialogue (much less something like ASSISTANT DA CHARLES KINCAID). Pick the first name or the last and stick with that, and make sure it's what you are calling him in the scene description.

EXCLAMATION POINTS IN SCENE DESCRIPTION. These look really amateurish. If you are writing an exciting scene well, you really don't need them.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Scott the Writer
    So right now, kismet is teasing me. You have to understand something about me. I'm a rather fast writer, when I have the time. But I nev...
  • Book Eating
    Though I rarely drag my ass out to go to stuff, Saturday night I'm going to Royce Hall at UCLA, for "Revenge of the Book Eaters...
  • Film Question --
    I'm looking for examples of movies in which the main character, who we assume to be the good guy all along, is revealed in the end to ac...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (1)
    • ►  April (1)
  • ►  2012 (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2011 (6)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2010 (36)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2009 (70)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2008 (117)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (9)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (15)
    • ►  January (15)
  • ▼  2007 (162)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (15)
    • ►  August (14)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (14)
    • ►  March (12)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ▼  January (17)
      • Creativity
      • Weekend Boxoffice #16
      • 50 Things
      • My Words Hung In The Air
      • Children Of Men
      • I've Said It Before, But I'll Say It Again...
      • Weekend Boxoffice #14 (In Retrospect)
      • The Illusionist (No Spoilers)
      • The Reading Thing
      • And Then Real Life Crashes In
      • The Process
      • Pleasure Seeking
      • A Good Day
      • Weekend Boxoffice #13
      • Jet Lag and Writing
      • Hell Has Frozen Over....
      • A New Year
  • ►  2006 (106)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (20)
    • ►  August (24)
    • ►  July (18)
    • ►  June (7)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

pollard
View my complete profile