So I watched this movie the other night, as part of immersing myself in a genre of film that myself and a writing partner are pondering writing.
What's hurting my brain is that, on a lot of pure storytelling levels, this movie just isn't very good.
The first act works fine, setting up the characters, and what they want, and the push-and-pull between Daisy and Hoak. Her need to keep control of her life, her way of spinning every situation so that even if she compromises, it seems to be on her terms. His finally getting her in the car.
But then the movie loses all shape.
There are some great scenes along the way, but it's just all very random. The only real structure is that 25 years are passing, and I guess they are slowly getting closer, but it's all rather wispy.
Ultimately, I think it's a good example of how a pair of great characters (and great actors) can make up for a lot of other ills. We like the dynamic between the two of them, and we're willing to briefly visit with them every couple of years in screen-time, even if nothing much has happened to them in the interim.
But it must have been a pretty thin year when it won the Oscar for Best Picture.
And I'm not sure why it's considered a comedy (it even won the Golden Globe in that category). Because there are some laughs here, but this is really a character drama enlivened by touches of humor, and the second half is pretty dry.
It's interesting to watch and tear apart, though.
********
On a snowy weekend that choked off the box office a bit, YES MAN did $18.3 million, SEVEN POUNDS did $14.8, and DESPEREAUX did $10.1. So I was ballpark for once.
Tuesday, 23 December 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment